Please take the following and consolodate it into quite detailed, comprehensive, coherent and clear meeting notes, make it quite detailed, make sure you don’t miss any points of discussion:
Was an NGO in Brazil, and I’m corrupt, and I’m getting some money, and I’m not doing what I’m supposed to do. Having sensors might be an issue. So I don’t know. I I really I don’t think that is the case, but on I wanna give you the data that I know I I want people to see. That is, you know Yeah.
So I I really don’t know. Let them review and they will respond. They seem to be smart people, responsible people. I look at LinkedIns in the meeting, and that lady is that is her job. She worked on partnerships, environmental in partnerships.
Yeah. It’s good. Yeah. Cool. So we have a lot And DMC is pretty reputable.
Just to know, like, they’re an American company who is based in Brazil. So it should be legit. Mhmm. So I know we have a lot to touch base on. The two main things on my side or from our side are the article guidelines that we sent to you yesterday and then also, WIP design that I think Peter and Roxanne wanted to talk you guys through.
I am happy to start with either of those topics. Does anyone have a preference? What’s the other topic? What’s the other Design. WIP WIP design.
No. Your topic. Yeah. What what Sorry. Article guidelines.
Let’s talk about design quickly. I think it yeah. Let’s talk about design. I’ll share my screen. Well, we like, it’s not, full design yet.
It’s just kind of we talked to Danilo a high level about what you guys showed, and we kind of have, like, 3 parts that we like, that we are trying to combine. And we made, like we have wireframes, but they’re not updated. We, like, have, like, a structure in, like, how we are seeing the site that we can chat about. Let me share. Yeah.
Yeah. We had actually made wireframes, like, complete wireframes for the whole website just for ourselves too to just understand everything because it helps. But after the meeting, some minor things changed. I think we can once we approve on what we would want to do in this meeting, we can, like, help to make a complete wireframe because, yeah, it’s always helpful to fully understand, like, because Oh, okay. Okay.
Let me check. So the first part of the website that we like we all like is the highlighting. This is, like, the main part that everyone fell in love with. So every time you hover over an article, you will get, like, directed to the data and so on. These are the reps that you guys gave.
We are collecting more, that that this is all like yeah. The these are just, like, very designee references that we like, or, like, how we are highlighting and maybe, like, in terms of motion, like, how how can we highlight to direct, to the data and so on? Can can you go quickly back to the first, page? Yeah. So our question so you showed us this reference on the left.
Right? Is this is this a reference for the system of, like, over like, seeing a lot of, like, links, like, visualizing the data and the links behind everything? Or is it also a visual reference, like, the like, when it comes to coloring and everything? Or how do you see it exactly? I think I think it’s it’s an example of how we see the behind behind the the scenes.
So each piece of, text will be linked to a number of interrelated, pieces of information, which might be linking to other piece of information. So there is, like, a deep network of of textual and data systems that lead towards I don’t think we specifically liked anything related to the color palette, for example. Yeah. We don’t hate it, but it’s not like here’s Yeah. We like Yeah.
I think what was very cool about this reference is it sort of so shows the strata, if you like, of information. We could almost visualize this idea that you could actually remove the text, and you could just have this almost beautiful print if you like that just shows layering and is a bit more conceptual with regards to how how things are built up. It was more of a conceptual reference than graphic, if you like. Yeah. Yeah.
Yeah. We fully agree. Like, because we saw a lot of stuff and, like, you guys sent us a lot of stuff. We also explored a lot of stuff. But this this visualization goes to the essence of the ID.
It’s the essence are the written text and, like, just showing I’ve while we were also thinking, and this is obviously a a conversation that you start with the article, but you can, like, hover over sentences. Right? And you see the specific links for that sentence. But maybe there’s, like, a little button that says view all. And when you click that, you see, like like, almost, like, too much to fully understand.
Like, bam. You know, to just show, like, fuck. This is insane. That was something that the Nilo said that, stuck with us that we like to, just to, show, like, it’s it’s full of, like, wiring behind it. That’s that’s super interesting.
So yeah. So maybe we can, like, start looking together for how what the actual visual visual style will be of the system, but I, yeah, I think it’s really nice. It’s a and just so I sorry. I have one more question, and then I’m gonna shut up for a while. Until the next slide.
No. This is this would be for every article on the website then. Right? Gotcha. Yeah.
That’s amazing. Yeah. Yeah. Or, like, maybe, I know when you’re on on your phone and you try to, yeah, you do comment, like no. It’s comment f on your phone where you highlight a word.
I know you have, like, arrows left and right and that go from one to the other. That might also be a way to, like, highlight different, parts instead of, like, hovering that you just can go through all of them, like, this part, that part, that part. That makes sense. That’s a bit weird, though, because we don’t have control. We won’t able we won’t be able to preselect the phrases if we use the system that you just described.
Like, if you if we give the users the freedom to select phrase on their own, then we lose the control of directing them through the workflow. I think the the selection mechanism should be very, very visible and created by us. So people can select whatever they want, or it’s more like when they hover, a part gets selected that is linked to the data. Because if they select whatever they’re they want, it might be, like, 5 data points that will come up. Do we have to guide them more, or do we leave it open?
One idea is to split the text in in chunks. Maybe these chunks are the paragraphs the paragraphs themselves or units smaller than a paragraph or larger than a paragraph. And each one could have a little indicator. I mean, that reference on the top right with the black boxes and the links is not exactly what I mean, but it’s an example of a markup of a little very visible attractive to click thing, what which prompts you to dig deeper. Yeah.
So as you’re reading, you can choose to dig deeper and then you actually go into the article and peel layers. Yeah. And when you’re saying you, I don’t I forget how you exactly phrase it, Chris, but there was, like I don’t know if that’s exactly how the data will work because, obviously, everything is connected. But would you have, like, a filter system to say, like, I want to see, everything that’s determined by local data or public data or soil data or, to have, like, almost, like, different colors, or is that is that just not relevant? Like, because we’re essentially telling a story that everything is connected.
So I don’t know. I’d what I’m saying is not, like, something I want. It’s more like a question. Like So no. Go ahead, Chris.
Mhmm. Yeah. So we could instruct the the the LLM to to write in a way where certain properties are grouped together. I don’t know if that makes a better story or not, but there there could be a story where everything is so mixed up, where you can’t really isolate an area that talks about water because the entire thing is about water and then the entire thing is about temperature. So we could make it look certain way, but it might not be good for the story.
Of course, you have you have the, you have an a a filter a a filter model that could be less active for the user, but explanatory, which is color coding. You could categorize what are the data points and assign colors, and then the highlights would deliver if it’s temperature related, it’s a color. If it’s local, it’s a color. If it’s and then you have some sort of a a filtering that is not as active for the user, but more, you know, it helps guide, but it doesn’t change experience. You know, like, I don’t know.
Whether this is feasible or not has to do with what part of the process we choose to show. For example, if we choose to show the inner workings of the language model, then the entire article has something behind it, which is not so easy to categorize because it we’re talking about all the layers of, of the large language model than all the prompts. If we choose to show categories like this is static data from the site, this is dynamic data from temperature, This is journalist data, etcetera. Then it what you say, Daniel, it’s becomes easier. So some data, you can see them across the text, and you can colorize them, but other data actually have to do with the entire with the entire article.
So it’s more like peeling a layer and seeing behind. That’s yeah. It it was just a question. It’s not that we really, really want want it. I think let’s I think yeah.
Let’s leave it open for now. But it it it is an interesting topic to talk about. I’m just gonna say how I per personally saw it. I might have been completely wrong, but let’s say you have a full article. And let’s say you, the article is divided in a 100, different data points, like, different data bulks.
So if you hover over a word, you, for example, have, like, a highlight over a sentence and that and then you see the data for that. But all those let’s say, a 100 data things that you can discover can also be color coded. For example, 50 of them are about soil or 20 of them are about temperature and 2 of them are, like, within the selection that we make of data, we can still divide. I don’t know if that makes any sense. Yeah.
Yeah. Mhmm. Yeah. I think an important question because this will we find a lot the development process is whether you guys as FCB or, you know, speaking on behalf of the client, maybe, do you think it’s interesting at all to to show the the inner process of the LLM or showing the data that we’re using is enough showing everything we we use as, like, raw material is enough. Because we we were discussing internally yesterday that there are these 2 big, 2 big tasks.
The first task is visualizing all the raw data, all the papers, all all the excerpts, all the data we collect, sensors, so that. And the other thing is how to visualize all the orchestration that goes on with all the prompts and the prompts, creating prompts, etcetera, which is the backbone of the LLM. They are 2 very different types of data, so they would probably require different way to Yeah. Visualize effectively. But, we were wondering how important, like, it is for you, to have either one of these categories.
Both. Is it an option where we divide those 2? Like, when we talk about the articles, we talk about because the LLM is for every article. Right? Like, the way it works is for every article.
So let let’s say we are on the on the article that on on the site somewhere, we we have, like, a a button that’s discover more about the LLM, how it works, blah blah blah, where we, like, like, kind of explain how it works instead of showing the article. Like like, this is how this article how the LLM worked on this article, if that makes sense. Yeah. It it could be something that belongs to different, let’s say, tab or view or Yeah. I do.
And it’s just about, the prompts and how the prompts link to certain databases and how the prompts link to certain examples of writing, etcetera. And then there is another view where you see the data Yeah. And the location and, the diagrams of the and the maps and all that. Yep. Yeah.
I think we need to art, we need to keep the articles as clean as possible, as simple as possible, although varied data. But, like, how, like, how it works or how we did it should be a different Yep. Something that’s important is if you imagine yourself reading reading it on a on a phone, you can’t have pop ups. Like, you you can’t have information just showing up because it will definitely be way too small. Mhmm.
We need to solve that, in terms of UI. It could be something where you swipe, and by swiping left or right, you reveal things behind that block of text. Mhmm. So the information covers the entire, the the entire screen of your phone or at least the width. Yeah.
So instead of thinking of a paradigm that’s more on a desktop website where you hover and things show up because you have the screen real estate to do that Yeah. Probably think about switching modes and seeing the content at all times full screen. Mhmm. Yeah. Okay.
Let’s go further. So the second one is the routes navigation that we still like. So, we are seeing this purely as, like, a navigation on the website. And in our sketch, we’re we’re we’re showing later. You will see how how it works.
How we’re seeing it is, like, the first, like, let’s you imagine, like, a one pager, and we have the tree on top and then roots go down. That is, like, the main page of the of the website. Yeah. So just to pick in, it’s the is the tree, on above and also the explanation of the ID. So do you have the name of the ID and the explanation on top with the tree?
And then, yeah, when you scroll down, like Ruxan is saying, you can go on. I just want to add, like, it’s not just the tree. It’s also the ID and then how we did it when you go down. Does that make sense? These are just some other references we found.
There’s no we’ll go through it. And then there is a third thing that we really like and we think could really, be visually very interesting for the Zoom website, and it’s a bit of the real versus the data, what all the client has been talking about. Like, it needs to be human like it’s very data, but it’s also, like, a real tree and so on and so on. So we found a a really nice reference that kind of shows a tree. And I think, Chris, you you I I I saw this reference in somewhere that you also did.
Like, what we like about this is, like, you have the data form of the tree and you have the real tree. Like, this do duality, we really, really like and it kind of shows us, we can divide this in, like, the the human word, for example, is when we talk about the tree, when we talk about the locations of the BOS and so on. The data world is when we we talk about the data of the articles and so on and so on. I’m gonna go further now because this is just mood, but we’re gonna explain to you where we are seeing this because we we know this is, like, visually very big, but we’re not seeing it as the full site. How we’re seeing it is this.
So as Peter said, like, we would start with that tree of the reference we showed you of the real tree as the star as the home page, as the start page. There we have the name, like tree correspondence, a little bit of information, and so on. And then we scroll down to the the the roots part, and we go into the roots. And there, we’ll have, like, all the information to get in the end to the article. We are seeing the up the articles all the way at the roots, like, all the way when when we have collected all the data to to the to the article.
So that’s kind of how we’re seeing the navigation. So we start with the with the tree visual, and then we go down. In this whole part, how we are seeing this and it’s good to discuss. It’s more about, like, how does it work, what is the story. It’s a bit like telling the the story of the of the project to take you through to the articles at the end.
Of course, there will probably be, like, a button here in the beginning that says, like, take me straight to the articles because that’s important. But this is kind of, like, the three things we we we talked about, and we showed you how we’re seeing it, as one. Of course, like, if we have, a part that talks about, like, the ionic forest or how does it work, there can still be, like, buttons that direct you to, like, a page, like, Chris, you showed us. Like, this is about ionic forest. This is about that.
This is about that. But this would be, like, the main. These guys Roxanne, something I, just I think I missed. When you say all the information to get to the articles, what sort of things does this middle part contain, for example? Sorry, guys.
We have to move quickly. We’ll answer your question in a minute. Okay. So it’s the overall. Yeah.
Yeah. I think it’s more about the the the overall story story of, like, how we we are getting to the article. So more it will first be about, like, hey. We have different trees in Ionic like, a short summary of, like, what that we have the trees in Ionic Forest that we used, data and hardware to collect from those trees. Like, how like, just like, it’s see it as, like, a summary of the whole project that leads to, like and these are the are the are the articles.
And you can click on those separately if you want more more information. Mhmm. Yep. Yeah. George, I see you doubting, thinking No.
I’m not. I’m not. It’s my my thinking phase. So, essentially, once you get to the bottom and you get to the article, then you have the things we were discussing earlier about highlighting and seeing individually. Okay.
Yes. Yeah. Because, like, what we did just to show you, like, we we started, like, basic basic wireframes on, like, this is the here. The tile needs to be here. A little bit of explanation, then you have an answer button and so on.
But we haven’t really, like, fully developed them because this is something we talked about with Danilo yesterday. So we weren’t able to. But, for example, if you click on on an article, the we will probably not have it, like, left, right. But, like, if you highlight, you you will get the code. If you highlight a a different part, you get the a a different code and so on.
But we would still have, like, for example, how does it work where where we show we have global data, we have local weather data, we have hardware data. Like, all of those things still have to be on the site, but we’ll probably be, like, different pages. Like, if people want to dive in, they can. Does that make sense? Yeah.
Yeah. Okay. Yeah. That’s it. Yeah.
That’s good. Yeah. It’s very, very helpful. And, in terms of the roots, are you thinking this act this representation that you that you are showing with the very organic, very realistic dense root system, and some parts of of it will be clickable, essentially, will have Yeah. With different color or they might vibrate or kind of flash a little bit.
Yep. I think the the more, like the most data data ish looking part is the articles when we show, like, all the all the data. Like, that can look, like, very, very, technological data. Like, we we we can give you more examples of that. I think we need to start with, like, showing the the human side of, like, the real the real tree and then that turns into the data tree.
But the roots, we do really like the, more drawn ish Mhmm. Feeling. We are doing a whole exploration on, like, for example, we found out, like, in different cultures, they draw trees different ways. So we really like that that aspect how because we have 3 trees in different continents. Like, how do they draw trees?
Like, it can use something of that in in our design. So we’re trying to go more that direction. But, yeah, that’s, like, working forward. So could we even have, like, literally hand drawn hand drawn graphics where we then process so some parts are aligned with clickable elements. Yeah.
Yeah. Yep. Yep. Yeah. I understand very much.
Yeah. Yeah. That that will that will be cool that you kind of have, like if you click on something that you kind of, like, have a zoom in or something or you, like, go to that part of the roots, and then if you go that kind of, like, zoom out again and yep. Yep. Yep.
Yeah. Yeah. I think Yeah. Nothing. Did you guys wanna talk about article guidelines at all?
I know Peter had to jump. But Yeah. I think Yeah. I I would love for Peter to go through that, to be honest. Okay.
Like, I but you guys have received the the guidelines. Right? Did you have questions that I can maybe answer? Yep. Yep.
Yep. Yeah. One one question. Are you guys seeing, like, those 4 articles, 3 of The Economist, 1, Nagio, all of them being checked? Or do we have Okay.
Yeah. Because it But But But sorry. We we could, we could say that, the role of these, of these are these first articles is to introduce the tree introduce the concept. So the tree doesn’t really mention the data. Specifically, it might it might refer to the fact that lots of things have happened, lots of events have shaped me, kind of give people the the impression that these trees actually linked to lots of things, but not talk about them.
And it’s it’s an intro. It’s essentially something you read, and then you know a little bit what to expect when you read the final Yeah. The real pieces. And the this kind of, is an easy way out of the situation where we don’t have enough data, for example. Mhmm.
Yeah. We work with Yeah. Because I think since pipeline is not finished. Yeah. Because I think since we’re using the all the check trees, it may it makes sense that the first article is more like an introduction.
But I think it should come from that tree, though, not, like, just trees in general. And then 2 and 3 are, like, more of like, hey. This is what I what I what I want to say. Like, this is, one point about that subject is that that there that you feel like there is, like, a conversation of the tree talking to to you within the different, newspaper. Mhmm.
Yeah. Let me discuss that here. There’s a lot of discussion from the NGOs regarding PR, not not in from Hyundai, regarding PR perception and Yeah. Potential backlash. Where do you place the risk?
Do you think it’s a high risk situation, or how do you feel about I think we are working very much on, like, messaging in, like, how are we gonna, first of all, talk about Ionic Forest because that is important to the client. But, I think we need how can I explain? We are also thinking about the articles. Like, the guy that was saying, like, it’s different if it’s more of an art piece than it it’s a scientific part. I think we were also going into that direction.
Like, maybe the articles feel sometimes more like an art piece than, like, a full on scientific article, which we, by the way, never mentioned that this held any scientific, like, purpose. Like, we are using the data, but we’re not saying we’re scientists. So I think, but we are overall we don’t think it will be dangerous, but we just have to make sure that the messaging is very clear and that what we are showing is not doesn’t look very scientific or, that we are gonna Yeah. Be angry, if that makes sense. Okay.
I get it. Then we might run into the other risk of general people reacting, worse when they see AI and art compared to when they see AI and science? Like, AI helping science is generally more acceptable than Yeah. AI art. Yeah.
I think I think of We’re not saying, like, that we are we’re doing an art project with with AI. Like, the the goal is still to do to do articles. But sometimes, like, how it visually looks like adding, trees in there, like, not making it like a full paper. Like, not making it look like a scientific paper because I think that is what those people were reacting to. Because there there’s, like, the other NGOs are not reacting like that.
It’s just them. Yeah. I think we can also, like, tailor the the final output for each region a little bit differently. Like, I think maybe for Brazil, the final article output needs to have more needs to look more artistic or needs to have more data visualization within it, than the article for Czech Republic by for instance. That might be more text heavy.
Yeah. Yep. And I I don’t think we ever wanna be and I don’t I’m talking out of turn here, but, like, I don’t think we are messaging it as an art piece. Like, obviously, it’s an ad still. Yep.
But we’re still messaging it as these are articles or these are this is from the point of view of a tree. Mhmm. It’s not necessarily AI creating art. It’s partnership with AI in partnership with humans to create stories from the point of view of a tree. Mhmm.
I see. And I think that the the more we progress into this project, I think the less important the the LLM part is to the story. Of course, technologically, it’s instrumental. It’s crucial. But in terms of the story, I think the ideas we find the little golden gems we find in the scientific papers, the data, all the work that Dan Richards is doing with the personas, I think all these are much more interesting.
Mhmm. And the AI is simply linking these things together. It’s you don’t need in a way, you don’t even need to mention this. It’s kind of what takes you from a to b to c to d. Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. And I think what I might be saying art in a wrong way, it’s also more like the the examples you you showed us that we really loved of, like, how the tree talks about, like, how the tree sees a butterfly, how that that the tree, like, eats the sun. It’s Mhmm. To me more artistic and scientific because it’s, like, their own language that they’re that we are now able to, like, understand.
And we’re Yeah. Yeah. And funny enough, today I just read in in a scientific paper, the term, carbon starvation. So which I felt it’s quite poetic, although it was in a very scientific manner, but at the same time, that’s their term, like the tree literally starving from a specific chemical. So thing that it’s it’s nice that sometimes this artistic language and the scientific language can blend and Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. Talk about the same thing. Exactly. Yep.
Cool. So I, like no. I I just wanted to to say I know, like, being put in that meeting and, like, with and and you, like, speaking out, I think, well, clients is aligned like we are joking. Yep. Yeah.
Can we do you mind showing the original layout that we presented to them? Just share. Yeah. Yeah. Just, like, to be clear, what what we’re what I’m gonna show you now is a lot of text.
It’s just it’s more wait. Wait. Let me see. We just wanted to show the clients what is, what is the division? Is that a word?
No. The division? Division? Division of what? Of the article and their and their and their.
Yeah. And just so you know, they had a lot of feedback on this. I think based on we based on what we were proposing initially, it’s more meant we see it more as advertorial. Like, this is the this is an ad, but it’s heavily text based. I think what they’re looking for is more at least for the first piece is more visuals.
Yeah. But but, like, I’d actually rather not show you this because this is just, like, how we it’s more about, like, the messaging here and, like, how we’re dividing it, than, like, this is how it’s gonna look like, if that makes sense. Because we yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Yeah. When do we show them a revision to that layout? Do you know? But, I think, like, in term like, the things that we need, like, we have probably need a data visualization. It’s a very hard work thing to say.
On the on the article and I think for the first article, we will probably have, like we’re thinking now, but the these are just, like, creative thoughts we are having now, maybe incorporating, like, an an image of the tree with the roots, for example, to, like, kind of fill up a space that we don’t that we don’t have the words for. Like, finding creative ways of, like, having showing the tree and then, like, their part of the payoff and then the article. But we will definitely need a data visualization that is, linked to to the article. That will be the only thing that will be linked. That makes sense.
We need yep. Yeah. We owe you based on the feedback that we got from the client, we need to go back to them with an updated layout Mhmm. For the actual design of the piece. And based on that and an approval, hopefully, we can give you guidance on, like, the word count for the the actual text.
And then Word count and subject. Yeah. So you guys can start generating based on the subject word Yeah. And then we can talk about. And then also how many places because there might be more than one visualization potentially.
Or I think I would keep it to 1, honestly. Okay. And just make it have multiple data visualizations, then I don’t know what we’re talking about. That makes sense. But we do have, like, local global data, right, that we can use?
Like, it won’t necessarily be, like, data from the tree, but we will have other data. Yep. Yeah. Okay. Yeah.
I think I think that’s fine. I don’t think, like, showing how it works or how we did it in that print ad will be very in like, clear for people. I I think you might confuse them more and open more questions. Okay. Is there anything else we should touch base on while we’re here?
Yes. Something that was just was on my mind. I think I should convey this. I think it’s generally much safer and accurate when we talk about the AI process to talk about instructing the large language model and augmenting it with new knowledge that it doesn’t have than saying we train it. Because we we’re not doing a training in any sense.
We’re not retraining anything. We are, utilizing existing models, and we have a pipeline where we feed them with new information, and we we shape their their answers. Okay. I think I think it’s it’s best to be honest about it. You never know where we might end if we say we’re doing a thing we’re not doing.
Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Yeah. You said, instructing.
And was there one other word you use? Yeah. Instructing and augmenting. Augmenting. Yeah.
So on the one hand, we really shape the way it looks at things. We we, direct its attention to specific things. We tell it how to talk. We tell it how not to talk. We tell it what concepts it should have knowledge of or kind of forget entirely about.
And on the other hand, we’re augmenting it with all this real data that it it does not have by default. It could not have by default because it’s a language model, but we are distilling, the key points from this data and feeding it into it. So we’re augmenting. It’s a bit Got it. Okay.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. We’ll we’ll make sure he he gets it.
Yeah. Yeah. And and, actually, Chris, thanks for bringing this up because the moment a tech savvy person hears this well, a tech savvy person with environmental sensitivities, they’re gonna say, you’re fucking wasting all this power and emissions training model Yeah. To trees. Are you crazy?
Yeah. This pro much more efficient. Mhmm. Makes sense. Yeah.
Yeah. 100%. Yeah. We would love to be involved in that. Thank you.
Yeah. Because that that also helps us to, like, steer into, like, which type of subjects we want to talk about, like, what is interesting. And and one last thing for me. I also asked Daniel on Slack, but do you guys have any connection with the Atlantic by any chance? Yes.
Someone, I just saw an email about from Tonga to the client about someone from the Atlantic. Was that your information, someone from the Atlantic is interested? I I am interested in talking to Zoe Schlanger. Yeah. That’s the that’s the girl.
Yeah. Emailed. Right? Tanga emailed about her. But that but what we’re say what you’re say George, do you know her?
No. I want to meet her. Oh, okay. I I thought, I would minimize, our degrees of separation because you guys are are there. So in New York, so you might have a way of, getting in touch with the Atlantic.
That’s easier than if I I’m planning to just email her directly, but I thought before I do that, maybe I ask you. I think what we’re gonna do first, it looks like Tanga wrote to the client to confirm, like, are you okay with us starting to contact for us specifically this person at The Atlantic? So once we get that confirmation, I think we can handle that outreach for sure. Cool. Cool.
Awesome. Thank you. Okay. Chris, I also sent you the work in progress document for all the interview questions. I wouldn’t if we had to share do we are we ready to share that with, like, the biomimicry or not biomimicry, but, like, meter group for instance?
Do you think that document would be ready to share, or should I hold off? Let’s talk to Alex. Okay. We have shared that with the clients, and to our local Czech client as well so she knows to prepare for her people. But before you share with anyone from METER, let’s let’s hold off.
Yeah. Yeah. Right. Great. Yeah.
That’s fine. That’s all good. Okay. We do actually have to go. I’m sorry.
Thank you for for doing this. We appreciate it. Chat chat soon. Thank you, guys. Bye.
Bye.