Please take the following and consolodate it into quite detailed, comprehensive, coherent and clear meeting notes, make it quite detailed, make sure you don’t miss any points of discussion:
Is it actually, like I think maybe George said this at one point. It’s like, it could that article be, like, a hello world? Like, I’m a I’m a tree. Yo. I’m a tree.
Like like, maybe it’s not about anything. Maybe it’s about a tree saying I’ve I’m finding my voice. Well, I would maybe say we we should personally, if so let’s say I was on their team. I don’t know if this should be necessary coming from us, but if I was on their team, if National Geographic was like hello world, I would maybe want The Economist to be something slightly diff I feel like there should be different differentiation. So is it like, which one comes out first?
Yeah. Because we know the audience is more curious. That audience is gonna be more curious. Yeah. And and then maybe The Economist could be because if we in crazy simple terms, The Economist is objective about you know, whereas the National Geographic is potentially it’s obviously objective, but it’s also a bit more opinion made.
So maybe we could say the 3 Economist articles are three statements. So maybe we don’t maybe it’s not about headlines. Maybe it’s about these are three things we want the tree to say. And so maybe the first one could be the tree making a statement about deforestation. This so and it could maybe go like issue optimism solution, for example.
Well, yeah. I mean, we need to make them so as well. But in terms of tree makes statement about deforestation, number 2 is tree makes statement about reforestation, And number 3, tree make statement about the the prospects future prospects, for example. And so they can they can be read as 1, 2, and 3, but they can also just be read in isolation. I’m I’m also really spitballing here.
I haven’t I’ll just so I feel like it’s gonna tell you money. That’s okay. Do you know do you know that Siri is now connected to chat gpt? So on my magazine, I can on my magazine on my MacBook, I can just type to Siri that question, and it tells me from chat JPT. Oh, Oh, I have no other than that.
Well, my answer from Chat CPT was The Economist Magazine primarily focuses on global events, politics, business, finance, economics, science, and technology. Its editorial stance is rooted in classical and social economic liberalism, advocating for free markets, free trade, free immigration, deregulation, and globalization. Publication also covers cultural topics, including art, literature, and lifestyle, providing a comprehensive analysis. So, actually, potentially, my my statement was wrong. But, Yeah.
Yeah. Mhmm. Yeah. I mean, I like the idea of being zoomed out and going in and in and in. So it could be like Copernicus.
You know, I’m I’m trying to kinda give it a bit of a concept to it. Like Copernicus, then it could be weather station, then it could be soil or something like that. Or like the leaf. We could then have something that’s from the perspective of the wet the leaf wetness. Or yes.